Facilitating Social Perspective Taking in Class through Discursive Game Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17742/IMAGE29716Abstract
This paper proposes and assesses a replicable game (co)design technique to encourage social perspective taking in the higher education classroom. Fully embracing the potential of research creation approaches, this discursive game design methodology approaches games as mediators of knowledge, emphasising the process of (re)creating, modifying, and comparing different game iterations. The paper reports on two classroom exercises that draw inspiration from Dungeons & Dragons and the Checkered Game of Life to foster perspective taking across different “learner personas” and different world views. Finally, this paper discusses how notating game modifications affords continuous game-based dialogue across student generations.
References
Allegue, L., Jones, S., Kershaw, B., and Piccini, A., editors. Practice-as-Research in Performance and Screen. Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.
Bader, C., Kolb, D., Weaver, J. C., Sharma, S., Hosny, A., Costa, J., and Oxman, N. “Making Data Matter: Voxel Printing for the Digital Fabrication of Data across Scales and Domains.” Science Advances, vol. 4, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1-12.
Bayrak, A. T. “Games as a Catalyst for Design for Social Innovation: Unlocking Legendary Tools.” The Design Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1409-1422.
Biesta, G. “Risking Ourselves in Education: Qualification, Socialization, and Subjectification Revisited.” Educational Theory, vol. 70, no. 1, 2020, pp. 89-104.
Bogost, I., Mateas, M., Murray, J., and Nitsche, M. “Asking What Is Possible: The Georgia Tech Approach to Games Research and Education.” International Digital Media and Arts Association Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, 2005, pp. 59-68.
Boyle, M. Research in Action: A Guide to Best Practice in Participatory Action Research. Australia Department of Families, Housing, Community Services, and Indigenous Affairs, 2012.
Bums, T. A. “The Game of Life: Idealism, Reality and Fantasy in the Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Versions of a Milton Bradley Game.” Canadian Review of American Studies, vol. 9, no. 1, 1978, pp. 50-83.
Cizek, K., and Uricchio, W. Collective Wisdom: Co-Creating Media for Equity and Justice. The MIT Press, 2022.
Colby, R., and Shultz Colby, R. “Game Design Documentation: Four Perspectives from Independent Game Studios.” Communication Design Quarterly Review, vol. 7, no. 3, 2019, pp. 5-15.
Cole, D., Werning, S., and Maragliano, A. “Playable Personas: Using Games and Play to Expand the Repertoire of Learner Personas.” Persona Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, 2021, pp. 38-53. https://ojs.deakin.edu.au/index.php/ps/article/view/965/1032.
Davis, Jade E. The Other Side of Empathy. Duke University Press, 2023.
de Witt, A., de Boer, J., Hedlund, N., and Osseweijer, P. “A New Tool to Map the Major Worldviews in the Netherlands and USA, and Explore How They Relate to Climate Change.” Environmental Science & Policy, vol. 63, 2016, pp. 101-112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.05.012.
Dishon, G., and Kafai, Y. B. “Making More of Games: Cultivating Perspective-Taking through Game Design.” Computers & Education, vol. 148, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103810.
Ender, M. G. “Experiencing Social Class Inequality: Modified Monopoly.” Teaching and Learning the West Point Way, edited by Ender, M. G., Kimball, R. A., Sondheimer, R. M., and Bruhl, J. C., Routledge, 2021, pp. 134-139.
Ellis, S., Blades, H., and Waelde, C., editors. A World of Muscle, Bone & Organs: Research and Scholarship in Dance. C-DaRE at Coventry University, 2018.
Fine, G. A. Shared Fantasy: Role-Playing Games as Social Worlds. The University of Chicago Press, 1983.
Gadamer, H. G. Truth and Method. Sheed & Ward, 1989.
Gehlbach, H., and Mu, N. “How We Understand Others: A Theory of How Social Perspective Taking Unfolds.” Review of General Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3, 2023, pp. 282-302.
Glas, R., van Vught, J., and Werning, S. “‘Thinking Through’ Games in the Classroom: Using Discursive Game Design to Play and Engage with Historical Datasets.” Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association (ToDIGRA), vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 145-169.
Jensen, Thomas Wiben. “Humor as Interactional Affordances: An Ecological Perspective on Humor in Social Interaction.” Psychology of Language and Communication, vol. 22, no. 1, 2018, pp. 238-259.
Johnson, D. W. “Cooperativeness and Social Perspective Taking.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 31, no. 2, 1975, pp. 241-244, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076285.
Junior, R., and Silva, F. “Redefining the MDA Framework—The Pursuit of a Game Design Ontology.” Information, vol. 12, no. 10, 2021, p. 395, https://doi.org/10.3390/info12100395.
Kafai, Y., and Burke, Q. “Constructionist Gaming: Understanding the Benefits of Making Games for Learning.” Educational Psychologist, vol. 50, no. 4, 2015, pp. 313-334.
Ke, F. “An Implementation of Design-Based Learning through Creating Educational Computer Games: A Case Study on Mathematics Learning during Design and Computing.” Computers & Education, vol. 73, no. 1, 2014, pp. 26–39.
Kleinfeld, R. Polarization, Democracy, and Political Violence in the United States: What the Research Says. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2023, https://carnegie-production-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/static/files/KleinfeldPolarizationfinal_3.pdf.
Koltko-Rivera, M. E. “The Psychology of Worldviews.” Review of General Psychology, vol. 8, no. 1, 2004, pp. 3-58, https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.1.3.
Kultima, A., and Laiti, O. “Sami Game Jam: Learning, Exploring, Reflecting, and Sharing Indigenous Culture through Game Jamming.” Proceedings of DiGRA 2019, 2019, pp. 1-18.
Lalone, N. “A Tale of Dungeons & Dragons and the Origins of the Game Platform.” Analog Game Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, 2019.
Loring-Albright, G. “The First Nations of Catan: Practices in Critical Modification.” Analog Game Studies, vol. 2, no. 7, 2015.
Mattlin, M. “Adapting the DIPLOMACY Board Game Concept for 21st Century International Relations Teaching.” Simulation and Gaming, vol. 49, no. 6, 2018, pp. 735-750, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118788905.
Midgelow, V. L., Bacon, J., Kramer, P., and Hilton, R., editors. Researching (in/as) Motion: A Resource Collection. Theatre Academy of the University of the Arts Helsinki, 2019, https://nivel.teak.fi/adie/.
Mouffe, C. The Democratic Paradox. Verso Books, 2005.
Muratet, M., Carron, T., and Yessad, A. “How to Assist Designers to Model Learning Games with Petri Nets?” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, vol. 15, 2022, pp. 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1145/3555858.3555937.
Nelson, R. “Practice-as-Research and the Problem of Knowledge.” Performance Research, vol. 11, no. 4, 2006, pp. 105-116.
Nelson, R., editor. Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Odendaal, A., and Zavala Barreda, K. “Black Boxes out of Cardboard: Algorithmic Literacy through Critical Board Game Design.” Analog Game Studies, vol. 5, no. 4, 2018.
Odendaal, A., and Zavala Barreda, K. “Imagining Inclusive Technological Futures through Participatory Board Game Design.” The Design Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, 2024, pp. 291-311.
Parra, S. L., Bakker, C., and van Liere, L. “Practicing Democracy in the Playground: Turning Political Conflict into Educational Friction.” Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 53, no. 1, 2021, pp. 32-46.
Petersen, K., and Gencel, C. “Worldviews, Research Methods, and Their Relationship to Validity in Empirical Software Engineering Research.” Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement, 2013, pp. 81-89.
Roms, H. “The Practice Turn: Performance and the British Academy.” Contesting Performance: Global Sites of Research, edited by McKenzie, J., Roms, H., and Wee, C. J. W.-L., Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 51-70.
Salter, A., and Moulthrop, S. Twining: Critical and Creative Approaches to Hypertext Narratives. Amherst College Press, 2021.
Schousboe, I. “The Structure of Fantasy Play and Its Implications for Good and Evil Games.” Children’s Play and Development: Cultural-Historical Perspectives, edited by Schousboe, I. and Winther-Lindqvist, D., Springer, 2013, pp. 13-27.
Schrier, K., Ohu, E., Bodunde, I., Alugo, M., Emami, C., and Babatunde, A. “Piloting a Game Jam in Nigeria to Support Empathy and Compassion.” Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events, 2021, pp. 60-63.
Sicart, M. “Loops and Metagames: Understanding Game Design Structures.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2015), 2015, http://www.fdg2015.org/papers/fdg2015paper22.pdf.
Skinner, S., and van Niekerk, J. “Incorporating Pedagogical Principles into Formal Game Mechanic Design Using the Machinations Framework.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Games Based Learning, 2017, pp. 593-599.
Smith, P. A., and Bowers, C. “Improving Social Skills through Game Jam Participation.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons, and Game Creation Events (GJH&GC ’16), 2016, pp. 8-14.
Smith, H., and Dean, R. T., editors. Practice-Led Research, Research-Led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
Tharp, B. M., and Tharp, S. M. Discursive Design: Critical, Speculative, and Alternative Things. MIT Press, 2018.
Turkle, S. “Seeing through Computers.” American Prospect, vol. 8, no. 31, 1997, pp. 76-82.
Turkle, S., ed. Evocative Objects: Things We Think With. The MIT Press, 2011.
van Rooij, S. W. “Research-Based Personas: Teaching Empathy in Professional Education.” The Journal of Effective Teaching, vol. 12, no. 3, 2012, pp. 77-86.
Waldinger, R., and Schulz, M. The Good Life: Lessons from the World’s Longest Study on Happiness. Random House, 2023.
Werner, L., Campe, S., and Denner, J. “Children Learning Computer Science Concepts via Alice Game-Programming.” Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2012, pp. 427-432.
Werning, S. “Modding as a Strategy to (De)Legitimize Representations of Religion in the Civilization Game Franchise: A Diachronic Proceduralist Reading.” Discourses of (De)Legitimization, edited by Ross, A., and Rivers, D. J., Routledge, 2018, pp. 307-325.
Werning, S. “Making Data Playable: A Game Co-Creation Method to Promote Creative Data Literacy.” Journal of Media Literacy Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, pp. 88-101.
Werning, S., and van Vught, J. “Taking Playful Scholarship Seriously: Discursive Game Design as a Means of Tackling Intractable Controversies.” Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, vol. 12, no. 1, 2021, pp. 101-121.
White, W. J., Arjoranta, J., Hitchens, M., Peterson, J., Torner, E., and Walton, J. “Tabletop Role-Playing Games.” Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations, edited by Deterding, S., and Zagal, J., Routledge, 2019, pp. 63-86.
Whitehill, B. “Games of America in the Nineteenth Century.” Board Game Studies Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015, pp. 65-87.
Zaidan, T., Zaidan, D., and Góes, L. F. W. “Game Mechanics Design: Applying Machinations to Eliosi’s Hunt.” XV Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment, 2016, pp. 313-321.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jasper van Vught, Stefan Werning

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This work by https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/imaginations is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed, or the author has exercised their right to fair dealing under the Canadian Copyright Act.