En (une) condition critique : Reconsidérations de la krisis, de la critique et de la theoria à travers la co-création en recherche
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.17742/IMAGE29715Résumé
Cet article explore le potentiel transformateur de la recherche-création féministe à travers le prisme de la krisis et de la construction collaborative de mondes, en positionnant la recherche-création comme à la fois une méthode et une éthique du care. En revisitant le concept grec antique de krisis—un moment de jugement et de discernement—comme cadre d’investigation, l’autrice met en contraste ses travaux académiques antérieurs, ancrés dans des cadres traditionnels de critique souvent associés à des métaphores de violence, avec les méthodologies réparatrices développées dans le cadre de son travail avec le Decameron Collective. Au cours de quatre années de collaboration itérative, le collectif a produit les projets numériques multimodaux primés Decameron 2.0 et Memory Eternal, qui utilisent la narration, la co-création et la curation pour répondre de manière créative à des crises allant de la pandémie au changement climatique. Cet article soutient que la co-création en recherche peut redéfinir la krisis comme un espace de potentiel génératif, où fabrication et théorisation s’entrelacent pour produire de nouvelles formes de savoir et de connexion. En centrant la relationalité, la matérialité et les éthiques féministes, le travail du collectif dépasse les modes d’enquête solitaires pour établir une pratique collaborative et orientée vers le care. En situant la recherche-création dans les traditions philosophiques de la theoria et la pensée féministe contemporaine, l’article met en lumière plusieurs manières dont cette création et curation collaborative peuvent soutenir les communautés, encourager l’innovation épistémologique et proposer des réponses réparatrices aux crises. L’article positionne finalement la co-création et la co-écriture en recherche, intégrant narration, design numérique et réflexion collective dans une érudition lente, comme une méthodologie essentielle pour naviguer à travers les défis globaux complexes et réimaginer le rôle de la recherche dans un monde confronté à des crises continues.
Références
Adorno, Theodor W. Aesthetic Theory. Edited by Gretel Adorno and Rolf Tiedemann, translated by Robert Hullot-Kentor, Continuum, 2002.
Armstrong, Jolene, and Monique Tschofen. “Digital Imaginations and the Decameron Storyworld (DIDS).” Application for SSHRC IDG submitted January 2023.
Armstrong, Jolene, Monique Tschofen, Caitlin Fisher, Kari Maaren, Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof. Make One, Pass It on: Digital Story-Telling Practice and Creation as Feminist Collaboration, and Care, with the Decameron Collective. Mount Royal, Calgary, PhilosoPHIA Conference March 14-17, 2024.
Aumont, Jacques. “Un Film Peut-Il Etre Un Acte de Theorie?” Cinemas : Revue d’Études Cinematographiques / Journal of Film Studies, vol. 17, no. 2/3, Spring 2007, pp. 193-249.
Avelar, Idelbar. The Letter of Violence: Essays on Narrative, Ethics, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Behar, Katherine. “An Introduction to OOF.” Object-Oriented Feminism, edited by Kathering Behar, 2016, pp. 1-36.
Braidotti, Rosi. “Between the No Longer and the Not Yet: On Bios/Zoe-Ethics.” Številka, vol. 23, no. 2, 2002, pp. 9-26.
Brown, Wendy. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton University Press, 2005.
Bourriaud, Nicholas. Relational Aesthetics. Translated by Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods, Les presses du réel, 1998.
Butler, Judith and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Conversation: Judith Butler and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: What Is Critique? 2011, Goethe University, Frankfurt, May 21, 2011 https://www.univie.ac.at/Geschichte/salon21/?p=5544.
Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuk. “Creation-as-Research: Critical Making in Complex Environments.” RACAR : Revue d’art Canadienne, vol. 40, no. 1, 2015, p. 49. https://doi.org/10.7202/1032753ar.
Cheah, Pheng. “Mattering.” Diacritics, vol. 26, no. 1, 1996, pp. 108–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.1996.0004.
Corona Haikus. 2020. Visual Poetry in Times of Isolation. https://coronahaikus.com.
Decameron Collective (Jolene Armstrong, Kelly Egan, Lai-Tze Fan, Cailtin Fisher, Kari Maaren, Siobhan O’Flynn, Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof, Monique Tschofen). Decameron 2.0 (2022). https://www.decameroncollective.com/.
Deleuze, Gilles. Proust and Signs: The Complete Text. Translated by Richard Howard, University of Minnesota Press, 2000.
DuBois, Page. Torture and Truth. Routledge, 1991.
Felski, Rita. The Limits of Critique. University of Chicago Press, 2015. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226294179.001.0001.
Fisher, Sibyl Annice. Curare: To Care, to Curate. A Relational Ethic of Care in Curatorial Practice. 2013. University of Leeds, PhD. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/6867/.
Fortnum, Rebecca. “Creative Accounting: Not Knowing in Talking and Making.” On Not Knowing: How Artists Think, edited by Rebecca Fortnum and Elizabeth Fisher, 2013, pp. 70-86.
Gardner, Catherine Villanueva. Women Philosophers: Genre and the Boundaries of Philosophy. Routledge, 2019.
Groenhout, Ruth. “The Virtue of Care: Aristotelian Ethics and Contemporary Ethics of Care.” Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle, edited by Cynthia A. Freeland, Pennsylvania State University Press, 1998, pp. 171-200.
Hollington, Sophy, and New York Times Company, editors. The Decameron Project: 29 New Stories from the Pandemic, Scribner, 2021.
Ingold, Tim. “The Textility of Making.” Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 91-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep042.
Irigaray, Luce. “The Ecstasy of the Between-Us.” Intermedialities: Philosophy, Arts, Politics, edited by Henk Oosterling and Ewa Plonowska Ziarek, 45-55. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2011.
Kristeva, Julia “Word, Dialogue, and Novel.” Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. EdIted by Leon S. Roudiez, translated by Thomas Gora et al. New York: Columbia UP, 1980, pp. 64-91.
Kubovy, Itamar, et al. Decameron Row. 2020, https://decameronrow.com/; Los Angeles Review of Books. Decameron Row. https://decameronrow.com/. Accessed 2 Jan. 2022.
Jones, Brandon. “Mattering.” Posthuman Glossary, edited by Rosi Braidotti, Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018, pp. 244-47.
Langlois, Ganaele. How Textile Communicates: From Codes to Cosmotechnics. Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2024.
Lewis, Charlton T., and Charles Short. “Cūra.” A Latin Dictionary, Perseus Tufts, https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0059%3Aalphabetic+letter%3DC%3Aentry+group%3D122%3Aentry%3Dcura. Accessed 6 July 2024.
Macchiavello, Carla. “Caring, Curiosity and Curating, beyond the End.” Seismopolite: Journal of Art and Politics, no. 11, July 2015, http://www.seismopolite.com/caring-curiosity-and-curating-beyond-the-end.
Manning, Erin. “Against Method.” Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research, edited by Phillip Vannini, Routledge, 2015, pp. 52-71.
Meyers, Natasha. “How to Grow Liveable Worlds.” ABC Religion & Ethics, 6 Jan. 2021, https://www.abc.net.au/religion/natasha-myers-how-to-grow-liveable-worlds:-ten-not-so-easy-step/11906548.
Miller, Tyrus. “Perversion and Utopia: Sade, Fourier, and Critical Theory.” College Literature, vol. 45, no. 2, 2018, pp. 330-59. https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2018.0020.
Loveless, Natalie, and Carrie Smith. “Attunement in the Cracks: Feminist Collaboration and the University as Broken Machine.” Feminist Formations, vol. 34, no. 1, Mar. 2022, pp. 272-94. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2022.0011.
Loveless, Natalie. How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research-Creation. Duke University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478004646.
Manning, Erin. “Against Method.” Non-Representational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research, edited by Phillip Vannini, 1st Edition, Routledge, 2015, pp. 52-71.
Matina, Marcello La. “The Notion of Krisis Between Late Antiquity and Late Modernity. Two Models of Reason at Issue.” Segni e Comprensione, no. 99, 2020, pp. 172-93.
Michaud, Ginette. “In Media Res: Interceptions of the Work of Art and the Political in Jean-Luc Nancy.” SubStance, translated by Roxanne Lapidus, vol. 34, no. 1, 2005, pp. 104-28. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2005.0013.
Moats, Stacie. “The Boccaccio Project: Musical Storytelling in Response to a Global Pandemic.” Music Educators Journal, vol. 107, no. 2, 2020, pp. 16-18, https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432120976085.
Nancy, Jean Luc. “Art Today.” Journal of Visual Culture 9.1 (2010), pp. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412909354265.
Nightingale, Andrea Wilson. “On Wandering and Wondering: "Theôria" in Greek Philosophy and Culture.” Arion, Third Series, Vol. 9, No. 2, Fall, 2001, pp. 23-58.
O’Flynn, Siobhan, Jolene Armstrong, Monique Tschofen, Angela Joosse, Caitlin Fisher, Kari Maaren, Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof, Lai-Tze Fan, Kelly Egan. “Memory Eternal: Speculative Memory-alizations, and Possible Futures.” Unpublished manuscript.
O’Flynn, Siobhan, Jolene Armstrong, Monique Tschofen, Kari Maaren, Angela Joosse. Create- a Thon: Digital Story-Telling Practice and Creation as Feminist Collaboration, and Care, with the Decameron Collective. Unconference, London, January 17, 2023.
Pitts-Taylor, Victoria. “Mattering. Feminism, Science, and Corporeal Politics.” Mattering, edited by Victoria Pitts-Taylor, New York University Press, 2020, pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833498.003.0001.
Puig de la Bellacasa, María. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press, 2017.
Puig de la Bellacasa, María. “‘Nothing Comes Without Its World’: Thinking with Care.” The Sociological Review, vol. 60, no. 2, 2012, pp. 197-216. Scholars Portal Journals, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02070.x.
Sabiescu, Amalia G. “Living Archives and The Social Transmission of Memory.” Curator: The Museum Journal, vol. 63, no. 4, Oct. 2020, pp. 497-510. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12384.
Sharma, Sarah. “A Manifesto for the Broken Machine.” Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies, vol. 35, no. 2 (104), Sept. 2020, pp. 171-79. https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-8359652.
Skibsrud, Johanna. The Poetic Imperative: A Speculative Aesthetics. McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2020.
Siemens, Lynne. “‘More Hands’ Means ‘More Ideas’: Collaboration in the Humanities.” Humanities, vol. 4, no. 3, Aug. 2015, pp. 353-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/h4030353.
Springgay, Stephanie. “Feltness: On How to Practice Intimacy.” Qualitative Inquiry, edited by David Lee Carlson, vol. 27, no. 2, 2020 2021, pp. 210–14, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420932610.
---. “‘How to Write as Felt’ Touching Transmaterialities and More-Than-Human Intimacies.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, vol. 38, no. 1, Feb. 2019, pp. 57-69. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9624-5.
Truman, Sarah E., et al. “The Intimacies of Doing Research-Creation.” Knowings & Knots: Methodologies and Ecologies in Research-Creation, edited by Natalie Loveless, The University of Alberta Press, 2020, pp. 221-50, https://go.exlibris.link/Vh5vfxNn.
Tschofen, Monique, Siobhan O’Flynn, Jolene Armstrong, Caitlin Fisher, Lai-Tze Fan, Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof, Angela Joosse, Kelly Egan. “A Research-co-Creation of Care: Feminist Speculation, Collaboration, and Curation in the Decameron 2.0 Virtual Gallery.” University of Toronto Quarterly vol. 93, no.4, November 2024, pp. 612-652. https://doi.org/10.3138/utq.93.04.06
Tschofen, Monique, Jolene Armstrong, Kari Maaren, Izabella Pruska-Oldenhof, Angela Joosse, Siobhan O’Flynn, “Speculative Archives and World Building: The Decameron 2.0.” Conference Proceedings, Electronic Literature Organization 2022.
Tschofen, Monique. “Drawing Out a New Image of Thought: Anne Carson’s Radical Ekphrasis.” Word & Image, vol. 29, no. 2, 2013, pp. 233-43. Taylor and Francis+NEJM, https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.2013.794916.
---. “‘First I Must Tell about Seeing’ (De)Monstrations of Visuality and the Dynamics of Metaphor in Anne Carson’s Autobiography of Red.” Canadian Literature, no. 180, 2004, pp. 31-50.
---. Kristjana Gunnars: Essays on Her Works. Guernica, 2004, https://go.exlibris.link/fYF9jp2C.
---. “The Denkbild (‘Thought-Image’) in the Age of Digital Reproduction.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 33, no. 5, Sept. 2016, pp. 139-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415598628.
Tschofen, Monique, Nataleah Hunter-Young, Dan Browne, and Lai-Tze Fan. “Reforming Critique: Critical Making as Method and Practice.” Canadian Comparative Literature: Contemporary Scholarship, Pedagogy, and Publication in Review, edited by Susan Ingram and Irene Sywenky, Lexington Books, 2019, pp. 135-154.
Van Stichel, Ellen. “Love and Justice’s Dialectical Relationship: Ricoeur’s Contribution on the Relationship between Care and Justice within Care Ethics.” Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 17.4 (2014), pp. 499-508.
Van Nes, Jermo, et al., editors. Relational Anthropology for Contemporary Economics: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84690-9.
Ward, Julie. “Theoria as Practice and as Activity.” Proceedings of Aristotele e Le Sfide Dei Suo Tempo., 2018, pp. 235-50. Loyola eCommons, Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works, Zotero, https://ecommons.luc.edu/philosophy_facpubs.
Ziarek, Krzysztof. The Force of Art. Stanford University Press, 2004.
Žižek, Slavoj. “The Poetic Torture-House of Language.” Poetry Foundation, 27 Mar. 2018, https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/articles/70096/the-poetic-torture-house-of-language.
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Monique Tschofen 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
This work by https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/imaginations is licensed under a Creative Commons 4.0 International License although certain works referenced herein may be separately licensed, or the author has exercised their right to fair dealing under the Canadian Copyright Act.
